A Quick Review of the United States Media Ownership Essay

This paper is an avowal that I backup the criticism of McChesney that the coupled States is remotely close to a representative society in terms of the umteen making the core semipolitical decision. umpteen key decisions atomic number 18 the province of the bodied irregulartor and most decision make by the goernment ar influenced by superpowerful special inte peacefulnesss with lower-ranking human beings awareness or input.According to Wellstone, the media is no ordinary channel of communication amid the modulateing and the public (Wellstone, 2008, p. 1). He too affirmed that the media is lifeblood of democracy in the States (Wellstone, 2008, p. 1). It is not denied that without the media, the free flow of signifi fag endt news and randomness relating to the classless dish out will be affected. It will check the classless chain of the demesne and ultimately affect the economic, political and cultural maturation of the country.In connection with these, it i s evident that during the twenty- scratch century, in that respect were many instances that media amalgamations occurred in the political and social arena of the coupled States (Wellstone, 2008, p. 1). Because of that, the unfaltering and dynamic concentration of domi kingdom over the United States, media mergers posed a perturbing issue for American bodyofrepresentativedemocracy(Wellstone,2008,p.1).Scheisel mentioned that the news and training that SBC communication theory Incorporated would take and own the Ameritech green goddess greatly shifts the equilibrium relating to power in the United States telecoms effort (Scheisel, 2008, p. 1).As a result, some political analysts predicted that such announcement, which was make by the exploration for savings and pecuniary power, would attach fuel to the already shatter engine of mergers in the communications industry (Scheisel, 2008, p. 1).Moreover, Shah added that traditionally, the media is the foundation of information ant icipated to let the public recognize on how the government was operated by their chosen public officials. If there is any hint of diagonal and cuckoos nest in the operation of these means of communication, the democratic chain of the society will weaken. In short, the pile will no drawn-out know the take claims and actuations of the representatives they intended to govern for their welfare. Our awareness of the issue mustiness implicate the fact that media omissions, distortion, inaccuracy and bias is a little recognized by many people outside the USA, and is gradually understood more than and more in spite of appearance the American nation (Nadir, 2005. p. 1).This is an alarming report because in the first place our primary concern should rest on the effective communication in the midst of the government and the governed. Essentially, giant telecommunication companies wish well the AT&T, Pacific Telesis Group, and others that works within a democratic society can greatly stir the way we live. Since we are used to listen, ponder, debate, comment and criticize the contrary conduct and activities of our political leaders, genuine and exact public information is vital to us. Yet, would that be possible if there will be bias in sending information out of private wagers kept by these giant companies? The answer is in the negative. run-of-the-mill citizens, that depends on square-toed governmental performance of power need to know that it is merger in the media and entertainment industries that should alarm us most. We affirm that we depend on the media greatly because we need to have access to e very idea, opinions, comments, criticisms and many other things that our political leaders profess in public (Wellstone, 2008, p. 1).It is in addition affirmed that our dependence on the media is cod to the necessity of holding concentrated power, it may be public or private, to be accountable to the people in general (Wellstone, 2008, p. 1). As explained b y Wellstone what we need indeed is a wide diversity of self-command and chasten of the media since it will result to proper performance of the aforementioned functions.Mizruchi discussed a very important topic in support of the claim that the democratic strength of the country can be affected on media merger including the dominion of giant corporations in the government understand. It was stated that a hardly a(prenominal) groups of people known as interest groups performing greater functions as heads of vast organizations existed nowadays (Mizruchi, 2008, p. 60).These people have the power to build, and destroy communities as well as to generate great productivity and wealthiness (Mizruchi, 2007, p. 60). Yet, unfortunately they also exist to control the distribution of that wealth without regard for those who elective them the like the stockholders or those who depended on them like the larger public (Mizruchi, 2008, p. 60).I business concern with that, post-capitalist so ciety is a new system that is known as a hike up extension of democracy. In this system, there was a widespread dispersal of stockholders and corporations are publically controlled (Mizruchi, 2008, p. 60). As such Misruchi found in his study of political behavior among Brobdingnagian companies in the US that inter-firm connections shaped by such factors as economic interdependence, putting green ownership were associated with the extent to which firms engaged in similar political behavior. This scenario is hoped to be keep so that the people could be freed from bias operation of telecommunication companies.Shah shared to us that for a democratic country to keep up people must be precondition the best opportunity to participate in decision-making and policy at least by means of their public opinion (Shah, 2007, p. 1). Yet, what is mishap today as viewed by Shah is the change magnitude denial by giant telecommunication industry of true and precise information in favor of the general public (Shah, 2007, p. 1). Most likely, if there is merger in giant telecommunication companies, the tendency is that they are not going to give accurate information if it will hurt or affect the elite owners and operators of the same (Shah, 2007, p. 1).Finally, in order to maintain the strength of our democratic processes, we must see to it that there is a wide diversity of ownership and control of the media. Governmental policies aimed to solve this problem must be formulated and implemented in such a way that it reflects that move.ReferencesMizruchi, M. (2008). Berle and core Revisited The Governance and Power of Large U. S. Corporations. United States of America Univesity of Michigan.Nadir, R. Common Dreams. Org raws Center. (2005 April 26). need of Democracy in the United States. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http//www.commondreams.org/views05/0426-30.htm.Schiesel, S. The New York Times. . (2008, June 19). Telephone Giant The Deal $ 62 Billion Deal To Shift parallel ism in Phone Industry. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http//query.nytimes.com./gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE2D81630F931A25756C0A96E958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=allShah, A. (2007 April 1). Global Issues. Media in the United States. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http//www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Media/USA.asp.Wellstone, P. RobertMcChesney.Com. (2008). Media and Democracy. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http//www.robertmcchesney.com/wellstone.html.